Go back
Save profile as PDF

Italy (Lombardy) / Regional development / Regional Law for re-organization of local institutions and their competences, and rules for the definition of mountain territories specificity.

IT08_ITC4_Regional Law for re-organization of local institutions and their competences, and rules for the definition of mountain territories specificity_2015

Name of the country Italy (Lombardy)
Sector Regional development
Name of the document (original) Riforma del sistema delle autonomie della Regione e disposizioni per il riconoscimento della specificità dei territori montani in attuazione della legge 7 aprile 2014, n. 56 (Disposizioni sulle città metropolitane, sulle province, sulle unioni e fusioni di comuni)- LR 19/2015
Name of the document (English) Regional Law for re-organization of local institutions and their competences, and rules for the definition of mountain territories specificity.
Administrative level Regional
Type of the document Legislation
Year of adoption 2015
Foreseen duration Unlimited
Comments The law establishes istitutional working groups in each Province, in order to test and compare performaces of local public services delivery in different territories. The aim of this comparison is to reach the most efficient and effective level of shared management of institutional functions and public services, expecially for remote areas that could take advantage from associated management models.
Sector Regional development
Territorial unit (NUTS/LAU) ITC4
Authority Lombardy Region
Availability in English No
Legally binding Legally binding (after approval)
SGI coverage SGI
Integration as a concept Yes
Integration elements
Actors
Policies
Adm. levels
Fin. sources
Others
Description Different administrative levels involved in the re-organization of competences for the local delivery of SGI
Major objectives To reach the most efficient and effective level of shared management of institutional functions and public services, expecially for remote areas.
Short Summary The law establishes istitutional working groups in each Province, in order to test and compare performaces of local public services delivery in different territories. The aim of this comparison is to reach the most efficient and effective level of shared management of institutional functions and public services, expecially for remote areas that could take advantage from associated management models.
Centralised/decentralised Decentralised
Governance model
Public services
Concession
Public-private partnership
Co-operative
Others
Comments
Type of finance
EU
Federal/national
State/cantonal/provincial
Regional
Local
No sources available.
Sources of finance
Private
Public
Stakeholders' list
Federal/national
State/provincial/departmental
Regional
Inter-communal
Local Municipalities
Open document URL in new window